| ABSTRACT
-from the
report
~10% |
INTRODUCTION
-from the report, additional files
~10% |
RESULTS
-from
the report, attachments Mathematica/Excel files, Gaussian, Lab View, web
submission form.
~50% |
DISCUSSION- from
the
report ~20% |
CONCLUSION-from the report ~10% |
Novel Discovery Science Level |
Novel Integrated Scientific Links |
Novel Instrumentation Work |
| Communication CXC Specific
Assessment Writing
Clear style. Concise. Questions that are investigated are clearly
communicated to a wider audience.
|
Writing style appropriate for the Introduction
section. The context for the work is established for a wider
audience. Peer reviewers can clearly follow the link between what
is done and what is the intention of this work. Writing about protocols,
methods and models is short and concise, key steps are easy to
follow. Key concepts are well
described and referenced.
|
Writing style appropriate for the Results section.
Separated paragraphs identify what question is being tested.
Objectivity in the results presentation
Avoided overlapping of presentations
|
Writing style appropriate for the Discussion
section. General audience can clearly follow your reasoning in the
discussion. .
Peer reviewers can easily find what is your
understanding and what are the consequences of you results in comparison
with previous knowledge
Individuality in style and creativity.
|
Clarity
Individuality in style and effort
|
Creative writing with clearly stated description of the
finding - aimed at all audiences .
|
Creative writing with clearly stated description of the finding -
aimed at all audiences
|
Creative writing with clearly stated description of the
finding - aimed at all audiences
|